The Bajaj Chetak and TVS iQube are two well-known names in the electric scooter market, particularly in the family scooter category. With the recent updates to both models, prospective buyers are curious about which scooter offers better value, performance, and features. Here, we’ll dive deep into every aspect, from price to battery life, motor performance, and more, to help you make an informed choice.
1. Price Comparison
Bajaj Chetak 3202: The Chetak 3202 is priced at ₹1,15,500 (ex-showroom). With additional accessories and offers, the effective price often lands around ₹1,26,000.
TVS iQube 3.4K: Priced slightly higher than the Chetak, the iQube’s cost may be a consideration for budget-conscious buyers.
Verdict: Chetak offers a price advantage, especially after cashback offers, making it a more affordable choice for buyers looking for value.
2. Battery and Range
Chetak 3202: Equipped with a 3.2 kWh battery, Chetak provides an IDC range of 137 km, translating to an actual range of around 100 km on a full charge.
TVS iQube 3.4K: The iQube offers a precise 100 km range, matching the Chetak. However, both scooters lack fast charging, so charging time is longer for both models.
Verdict: The battery performance is comparable, but Chetak’s slight advantage in improved portable charging time (3 hours to charge 20% to 80%) gives it an edge for convenience.
3. Motor Performance
Chetak 3202: Features a 4.2 kW PMSM motor, providing a top speed of 63 km/h, and up to 73 km/h with an upgrade. Acceleration is smooth, reaching 0–40 km/h in 4.7 seconds.
TVS iQube 3.4K: The iQube has a 4.4 kW hub motor, reaching a top speed of 78 km/h and 0–40 km/h in 4.2 seconds. However, its hub motor design may limit durability on rough roads.
Verdict: Chetak’s side-mounted motor design is preferable for varied terrains, while iQube’s higher top speed may appeal to city riders.
4. Build Quality and Suspension
Chetak 3202: Known for its metal body, Chetak provides excellent build quality and durability. Its leading link suspension and 12-inch rear suspension make for a stable ride.
TVS iQube 3.4K: With a standard alloy frame, the iQube offers good balance. Its dual suspension setup and 12-inch alloy wheels are standard for the category.
Verdict: Chetak’s robust metal body provides superior durability, ideal for those seeking a long-term investment in quality.
5. Braking and Safety Features
Chetak 3202: Comes with a single-sided suspension and front and rear drum brakes.
TVS iQube 3.4K: Equipped with a front disc brake, providing enhanced braking efficiency compared to Chetak.
Verdict: TVS iQube’s disc brake adds an extra layer of safety, making it a plus for riders who prioritize braking performance.
6. Storage and Boot Space
Chetak 3202: Offers a 21-liter boot space, with a small front storage box for essentials.
TVS iQube 3.4K: Provides a larger 32-liter boot space, accommodating more than Chetak.
Verdict: For those needing more storage, the TVS iQube stands out with its additional boot space.
7. Display and Dashboard Features
Chetak 3202: A circular LCD display provides essential information. With the optional Tac pack, it includes Bluetooth, reverse mode, and a 73 km/h sport mode.
TVS iQube 3.4K: Equipped with a 5-inch LCD display offering Bluetooth connectivity, GPS navigation, OTA updates, anti-theft alert, and crash/fall alert.
Verdict: The TVS iQube’s advanced dashboard features give it a technological edge, appealing to tech-savvy users.
8. Warranty and After-Sales Support
Chetak 3202: Offers a 3-year or 50,000 km warranty on both the vehicle and battery, with an optional extended warranty of up to 5 years.
TVS iQube 3.4K: Comes with the same warranty terms as Chetak, making them comparable.
Verdict: Warranty coverage is similar for both scooters, giving buyers peace of mind with either option.
9. Riding Comfort
Chetak 3202: With a sturdier frame and single-sided suspension, Chetak is ideal for urban commutes.
TVS iQube 3.4K: Offers dual-sided suspension, adding stability for city roads.
Verdict: Both scooters provide comfortable rides, though TVS’s dual-sided suspension is better suited for uneven city roads.
10. Charging Convenience
Chetak 3202: Has improved charging efficiency for portable chargers, requiring around 3 hours to charge from 20% to 80%.
TVS iQube 3.4K: Charges similarly, though slightly slower compared to Chetak’s recent improvements.
Verdict: Chetak’s optimized charging time gives it an advantage, particularly for on-the-go charging needs.
Comparing Tata Tiago EV and BYD Seagull EV 2024: Specs and Features – EV Gear Review
FAQs
Which scooter offers better mileage?
Both provide a real-world range of around 100 km, but Chetak charges slightly faster.
Is the Chetak’s build quality better?
Yes, its metal body is more durable but adds some weight compared to the iQube.
Are these scooters good for long commutes?
Both are suited for daily city commutes rather than long-distance travel.
Which scooter has better display features?
iQube’s display includes internet connectivity, navigation, and additional safety alerts.
Are fast charging options available?
Neither offers fast charging, but Chetak’s portable charging is optimized for quicker turnaround.
Which has better braking performance?
TVS iQube’s front disc brake provides better braking efficiency than Chetak’s drum brakes.
